朋友给我建议,对价值观这种事,要用案例、故事来说明,而不是干瘪地讲那句大道理。
价值观是可以指引产品方向,决定某个特性做或不做的,比如我们的价值观里,有一条“客户价值优先”,即:以客户为中心,解决客户问题,做对客户有价值的事。
拿印象笔记给他们的付费会员推广告(通常类似 x 折续费)的事来说,可以判断一下对客户(付费用户)的价值,我勉强想到俩“长期、间接”的价值:
朋友给我建议,对价值观这种事,要用案例、故事来说明,而不是干瘪地讲那句大道理。
价值观是可以指引产品方向,决定某个特性做或不做的,比如我们的价值观里,有一条“客户价值优先”,即:以客户为中心,解决客户问题,做对客户有价值的事。
拿印象笔记给他们的付费会员推广告(通常类似 x 折续费)的事来说,可以判断一下对客户(付费用户)的价值,我勉强想到俩“长期、间接”的价值:
Pinboard(https://pinboard.in/)是我多年前很喜欢过的一款产品,喜欢的原因有:
多年前喜欢并付费了,付的还是比较贵的 archive(可以将 URL 的内容缓存下来)。可惜的是,当时他对国内对网页支持不好(其实是国内不少网页“特立独行”了),比如微信公众号,在 Pinboard 里曾经好几年获取不到正确对标题(Title),给作者写信得不到反馈后,我只好放弃付费,此后辗转了如 Pocket、Readability、Instapaper 之类的产品,都不喜欢,最终放弃了“书签收藏”产品。
其实过程中还有个小插曲,我们甚至自己做了一个——在知识星球里,曾经输入一个 URL,就能自动获取 Title,并且缓存下链接内容。本来曾经想,打磨一段时间后,可以成为一个有价值的功能,后来发现自己想简单了,功能最终砍掉了。
昨天突然收到 Maciej 的邮件,大意是请老用户“转换”用户形态——之前是一次付费,终身使用,他想请这些老用户更改为年付。我好奇心起,又看了看:
感觉他遇到的主要问题可能是:
不过还好基数不大,从 Pocket 这些产品里抢一些用户过来,应该还是有机会的。
一些链接:
附上 Pinboard 作者的邮件原文:
Hi there,
My name is Maciej, I run the bookmarking site Pinboard, and I’m writing to ask for your help.
You joined the site back when there was a one-time signup fee. Back then, charging for bookmarking online was unheard of, and the fee was more of an anti-spam measure than a revenue model.
In 2015, I changed Pinboard over to a subscription site, where even “basic” users (who don’t use the archiving feature) have to pay an annual fee. But I did not make this change retroactive, since that felt like going back on a promise.
Today I’m asking you to voluntarily change the way you use the site by going to https://pinboard.in/convert and converting your account to a ‘modern’ one, the kind you have to pay for every year.
Let me explain why:
First, it will allow me to do more active development on the site. As a solo developer, this has become difficult as the site gets bigger and older. I not only run and maintain all the code, but I also install and fix the physical hardware, keep up with the various patches and breaking changes at every level, run and test backups, and try to keep up with big changes in the way the web works (like the huge move to javascript, which is hard to archive).
I would describe my work like single-handedly running a restaurant in an old château. It’s cool and fun, and the ambiance is great, but occasionally the soup is served cold or not at all because I have to chase a bunch of bats out of the kitchen, or replace a collapsed beam, while the diners sit and wait. This is no fun for either me or the diners, who rightfully complain that it ruins their dinner.
Having more paying users would let me hire some dedicated carpenters and and bat-chasers that would let me focus on the cooking.
Second, it’s become rather hard to have two populations of users, one of whom pays annually for a service that the other gets for free. Right now, about 2/3 of Pinboard users with basic accounts are people who signed up, like you did, in 2009 or 2010 with a one-time payment. The remaining 1/3 pays $22 a year. I have noticed this has created some feelings of annoyance in the paying group, odd expectations in the one-time group, and a general confusion about pricing policy.
其实去年脑海里一直在盘旋着“是不是该将知识星球的使命愿景价值观梳理出来”的想法,但一直觉得没想清楚。这期间看了不少组织、企业文化相关但书,也结合着公司但实际情况、产品但发展做了些思考,昨天静静地坐下来,将当下的想法写下来。
促进分享。让更多人通过内容与连接,创造并收获价值。
此前曾纠结“笔记写得太短,价值不够”,现在想想,有没有价值,跟文字长短没关系。
今天简单记录一个虚拟支付的问题——微信小程序、小商店里,目前是无法通过微信支付付款加入知识星球的,因为知识星球是“虚拟商品”,提供的是服务。
而虚拟商品不被微信支付支持,我理解是因为:
还是有投资人提的几个问题,简单回复了,顺手记录一下。
1、知识星球首先是服务于星球主的工具,如何平衡他们的需求多样和我们产品化的方向?
2、我发现很多人的转化是特定场景下的,包括我自己,那么如何平衡这相对低频高价的情况和我们希望持续付费转化的矛盾呢?